Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Adair	Clinton	33.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.8%
	Other	10.7%

Alfalfa	Clinton	28.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	58.1%
	Other	14.0%

Atoka	Clinton	28.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.4%
	Other	16.1%

Beaver	Clinton	28.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.2%
	Other	18.9%

Beckham	Clinton	31.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.5%
	Other	13.4%

Blaine	Clinton	37.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.8%
	Other	11.0%

Bryan	Clinton	31.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.9%
	Other	11.9%

Caddo	Clinton	36.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.1%
	Other	10.5%

Canadian	Clinton	38.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.3%
	Other	5.3%

Carter	Clinton	32.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.0%
	Other	12.7%

Cherokee	Clinton	38.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.4%
	Other	5.9%

Choctaw	Clinton	29.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.4%
	Other	14.6%

Cimarron	Clinton	17.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.0%
	Other	28.6%

Cleveland	Clinton	37.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	59.3%
	Other	3.1%

Coal	Clinton	19.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	63.5%
	Other	17.4%

Comanche	Clinton	44.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	48.5%
	Other	6.6%

Cotton	Clinton	29.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.4%
	Other	14.0%

Craig	Clinton	35.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.5%
	Other	9.7%

Creek	Clinton	42.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.9%
	Other	7.1%

Custer	Clinton	33.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	57.1%
	Other	9.3%

Delaware	Clinton	41.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.5%
	Other	8.3%

Dewey	Clinton	27.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.4%
	Other	17.0%

Ellis	Clinton	23.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	64.1%
	Other	12.6%

Garfield	Clinton	41.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.2%
	Other	6.5%

Garvin	Clinton	32.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.1%
	Other	13.2%

Grady	Clinton	34.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.2%
	Other	9.6%

Grant	Clinton	31.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	57.1%
	Other	11.0%

Greer	Clinton	27.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.9%
	Other	16.6%

Harmon	Clinton	37.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.9%
	Other	11.9%

Harper	Clinton	26.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	57.6%
	Other	16.3%

Haskell	Clinton	32.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.9%
	Other	15.4%

Hughes	Clinton	33.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.7%
	Other	13.2%

Jackson	Clinton	38.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.8%
	Other	11.5%

Jefferson	Clinton	29.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.7%
	Other	18.9%

Johnston	Clinton	24.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	57.8%
	Other	17.4%

Kay	Clinton	38.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.5%
	Other	8.1%

Kingfisher	Clinton	33.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	58.5%
	Other	8.3%

Kiowa	Clinton	34.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.0%
	Other	11.1%

Latimer	Clinton	31.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.3%
	Other	15.5%

Le Flore	Clinton	33.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.5%
	Other	16.3%

Lincoln	Clinton	38.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.8%
	Other	7.7%

Logan	Clinton	42.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.6%
	Other	5.3%

Love	Clinton	32.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.1%
	Other	16.9%

McClain	Clinton	35.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	57.1%
	Other	7.4%

McCurtain	Clinton	28.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.3%
	Other	19.3%

McIntosh	Clinton	40.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.6%
	Other	10.2%

Major	Clinton	34.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.2%
	Other	12.1%

Marshall	Clinton	30.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.0%
	Other	13.7%

Mayes	Clinton	40.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.7%
	Other	8.4%

Murray	Clinton	32.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.6%
	Other	12.7%

Muskogee	Clinton	44.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.6%
	Other	8.6%

Noble	Clinton	35.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	54.8%
	Other	9.9%

Nowata	Clinton	38.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.9%
	Other	11.9%

Okfuskee	Clinton	36.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.5%
	Other	10.7%

Oklahoma	Clinton	50.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	47.4%
	Other	2.5%

Okmulgee	Clinton	45.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.1%
	Other	8.1%

Osage	Clinton	47.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.2%
	Other	6.3%

Ottawa	Clinton	39.3%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.1%
	Other	10.6%

Pawnee	Clinton	40.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.2%
	Other	8.4%

Payne	Clinton	38.9%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.7%
	Other	4.4%

Pittsburg	Clinton	31.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.8%
	Other	12.6%

Pontotoc	Clinton	29.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	59.8%
	Other	10.6%

Pottawatomie	Clinton	37.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	55.5%
	Other	6.9%

Pushmataha	Clinton	26.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.1%
	Other	17.2%

Roger Mills	Clinton	21.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	58.0%
	Other	20.3%

Rogers	Clinton	39.6%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	52.9%
	Other	7.5%

Seminole	Clinton	39.1%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	50.1%
	Other	10.8%

Sequoyah	Clinton	36.0%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.6%
	Other	14.4%

Stephens	Clinton	31.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.1%
	Other	12.7%

Texas	Clinton	31.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	46.7%
	Other	21.6%

Tillman	Clinton	33.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	53.7%
	Other	13.0%

Tulsa	Clinton	47.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.6%
	Other	3.0%

Wagoner	Clinton	43.5%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	49.2%
	Other	7.3%

Washington	Clinton	42.4%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	51.6%
	Other	6.0%

Washita	Clinton	25.2%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	59.9%
	Other	14.9%

Woods	Clinton	33.7%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	56.6%
	Other	9.6%

Woodward	Clinton	30.8%
	0	0.0%
	Sanders	62.4%
	Other	6.8%

National DataGraph for 2016 - Oklahoma Results for 2016

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved