Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Data Graphs

Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Map

Aitkin	Walz	35.9%
	Jensen	60.6%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.7%

Anoka	Walz	47.7%
	Jensen	49.0%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.6%

Becker	Walz	32.1%
	Jensen	64.3%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.6%

Beltrami	Walz	44.9%
	Jensen	51.1%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	3.2%

Benton	Walz	32.0%
	Jensen	64.0%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	3.0%

Big Stone	Walz	35.4%
	Jensen	61.2%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.7%

Blue Earth	Walz	52.0%
	Jensen	44.9%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.2%

Brown	Walz	33.6%
	Jensen	63.9%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	1.8%

Carlton	Walz	49.8%
	Jensen	45.8%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	3.4%

Carver	Walz	45.9%
	Jensen	51.8%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	1.6%

Cass	Walz	33.3%
	Jensen	63.3%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.7%

Chippewa	Walz	34.0%
	Jensen	63.2%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.0%

Chisago	Walz	36.0%
	Jensen	60.4%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.9%

Clay	Walz	50.1%
	Jensen	45.9%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	3.2%

Clearwater	Walz	24.6%
	Jensen	71.4%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	3.1%

Cook	Walz	67.4%
	Jensen	29.7%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.0%

Cottonwood	Walz	29.5%
	Jensen	66.8%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	2.6%

Crow Wing	Walz	34.9%
	Jensen	61.8%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.6%

Dakota	Walz	55.8%
	Jensen	41.5%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.0%

Dodge	Walz	34.9%
	Jensen	62.1%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.1%

Douglas	Walz	32.3%
	Jensen	64.9%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.0%

Faribault	Walz	33.2%
	Jensen	63.8%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.1%

Fillmore	Walz	40.1%
	Jensen	57.2%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.0%

Freeborn	Walz	41.0%
	Jensen	55.7%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.5%

Goodhue	Walz	43.0%
	Jensen	53.7%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.4%

Grant	Walz	35.7%
	Jensen	60.0%
	McTavish	1.3%
	Other	3.1%

Hennepin	Walz	70.4%
	Jensen	26.8%
	McTavish	0.6%
	Other	2.2%

Houston	Walz	41.2%
	Jensen	55.7%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.4%

Hubbard	Walz	34.5%
	Jensen	61.9%
	McTavish	1.0%
	Other	2.6%

Isanti	Walz	30.6%
	Jensen	65.1%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	3.4%

Itasca	Walz	42.2%
	Jensen	53.8%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	3.1%

Jackson	Walz	29.6%
	Jensen	67.0%
	McTavish	1.0%
	Other	2.4%

Kanabec	Walz	31.8%
	Jensen	64.0%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	3.4%

Kandiyohi	Walz	35.2%
	Jensen	61.9%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.1%

Kittson	Walz	35.8%
	Jensen	60.2%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	3.3%

Koochiching	Walz	39.4%
	Jensen	56.5%
	McTavish	1.0%
	Other	3.1%

Lac Qui Parle	Walz	35.0%
	Jensen	61.4%
	McTavish	1.2%
	Other	2.4%

Lake	Walz	52.5%
	Jensen	44.2%
	McTavish	0.6%
	Other	2.7%

Lake of the Woods	Walz	25.9%
	Jensen	71.0%
	McTavish	1.0%
	Other	2.1%

Le Sueur	Walz	34.7%
	Jensen	61.9%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.5%

Lincoln	Walz	29.1%
	Jensen	67.7%
	McTavish	0.5%
	Other	2.7%

Lyon	Walz	33.3%
	Jensen	63.9%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	1.9%

McLeod	Walz	31.4%
	Jensen	65.4%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.3%

Mahnomen	Walz	39.5%
	Jensen	54.5%
	McTavish	2.1%
	Other	3.9%

Marshall	Walz	23.5%
	Jensen	73.0%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	2.5%

Martin	Walz	29.5%
	Jensen	67.4%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.3%

Meeker	Walz	29.7%
	Jensen	67.0%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.4%

Mille Lacs	Walz	30.6%
	Jensen	65.1%
	McTavish	1.0%
	Other	3.3%

Morrison	Walz	22.3%
	Jensen	74.6%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.2%

Mower	Walz	46.6%
	Jensen	49.9%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.8%

Murray	Walz	26.8%
	Jensen	69.7%
	McTavish	1.3%
	Other	2.2%

Nicollet	Walz	51.8%
	Jensen	45.5%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	1.9%

Nobles	Walz	30.5%
	Jensen	66.0%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	2.4%

Norman	Walz	37.1%
	Jensen	57.8%
	McTavish	1.2%
	Other	3.8%

Olmsted	Walz	55.0%
	Jensen	42.7%
	McTavish	0.6%
	Other	1.7%

Otter Tail	Walz	31.4%
	Jensen	65.3%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.4%

Pennington	Walz	31.8%
	Jensen	63.4%
	McTavish	1.5%
	Other	3.3%

Pine	Walz	34.6%
	Jensen	61.3%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	3.3%

Pipestone	Walz	22.9%
	Jensen	74.0%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.2%

Polk	Walz	31.1%
	Jensen	65.7%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.5%

Pope	Walz	34.7%
	Jensen	62.6%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	1.9%

Ramsey	Walz	71.5%
	Jensen	25.1%
	McTavish	0.6%
	Other	2.8%

Red Lake	Walz	30.1%
	Jensen	65.4%
	McTavish	1.5%
	Other	3.0%

Redwood	Walz	26.4%
	Jensen	71.1%
	McTavish	0.5%
	Other	1.9%

Renville	Walz	29.9%
	Jensen	66.6%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.7%

Rice	Walz	50.2%
	Jensen	46.4%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.6%

Rock	Walz	27.5%
	Jensen	69.5%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.2%

Roseau	Walz	23.6%
	Jensen	73.6%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.0%

St. Louis	Walz	57.7%
	Jensen	38.1%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	3.4%

Scott	Walz	45.4%
	Jensen	51.9%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.0%

Sherburne	Walz	32.9%
	Jensen	63.7%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.6%

Sibley	Walz	28.8%
	Jensen	68.3%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.2%

Stearns	Walz	36.9%
	Jensen	59.8%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.5%

Steele	Walz	39.3%
	Jensen	57.3%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.6%

Stevens	Walz	36.9%
	Jensen	60.4%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	1.9%

Swift	Walz	35.5%
	Jensen	61.5%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	2.3%

Todd	Walz	24.4%
	Jensen	71.6%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	2.9%

Traverse	Walz	33.5%
	Jensen	62.5%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	2.8%

Wabasha	Walz	37.5%
	Jensen	59.3%
	McTavish	1.0%
	Other	2.3%

Wadena	Walz	25.3%
	Jensen	71.2%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.7%

Waseca	Walz	33.9%
	Jensen	62.2%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	2.8%

Washington	Walz	54.2%
	Jensen	43.2%
	McTavish	0.7%
	Other	1.9%

Watonwan	Walz	37.4%
	Jensen	60.1%
	McTavish	0.4%
	Other	2.1%

Wilkin	Walz	27.2%
	Jensen	68.8%
	McTavish	1.1%
	Other	3.0%

Winona	Walz	48.4%
	Jensen	48.5%
	McTavish	0.8%
	Other	2.4%

Wright	Walz	34.9%
	Jensen	61.9%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.3%

Yellow Medicine	Walz	29.8%
	Jensen	66.9%
	McTavish	0.9%
	Other	2.4%

National DataGraph for 2022 - Minnesota Results for 2022

Login

Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved