Megathread: Congressional Vote on the Iran Deal (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 11:25:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Megathread: Congressional Vote on the Iran Deal (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Megathread: Congressional Vote on the Iran Deal  (Read 49173 times)
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« on: August 15, 2015, 04:18:19 PM »

Massie, Amash, Duncan and Jones are still decent GOP possibilities for support of the deal, I'd think, given previous votes and statements.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2015, 09:54:13 PM »

I think Rep. Walter Jones is a possibility, but I think he might vote no, since he has another tough primary challenge coming up.

He is one who can be fairly counted on to follow his conscience when it comes to issues of war and peace.   
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2015, 03:23:21 PM »


no, Lugar would support it even if he were still a Senator.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2015, 05:37:09 PM »

The info coming out on these side deals regarding Iranian self-inspection may make the vote even on sustaining the veto uncomfortably close.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2015, 10:45:08 PM »

The info coming out on these side deals regarding Iranian self-inspection may make the vote even on sustaining the veto uncomfortably close.

There's a fair deal of controversy there with the original AP article.

Interesting, and a relief to hear that it isn't what it's made out to be.  Still there will be commercials and politicians citing the AP.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2015, 01:51:11 PM »

Well, at this point, Manchin is leaning yes, which gets us to 35. The 9 undecided Democrats are Bennet, Blumenthal, Booker, Cantwell, Cardin, Heitkamp, Peters, Warner, and Wyden. Obama only needs Manchin plus six of those to filibuster. Who are the three most likely of those to vote no? Booker, Wyden, and Heitkamp?

Cardin would be one of the more likely No votes.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,769
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2015, 05:09:52 PM »

Amash is a no.  He doesn't consider the deal constitutionally valid.

https://www.facebook.com/repjustinamash/posts/948120658560674
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 10 queries.