Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 25, 2013, 02:43:14 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
Congressional Elections
(Moderator:
Joe Republic
)
Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
[
7
]
8
9
10
11
12
...
14
Author
Topic: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge (Read 19315 times)
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #150 on:
August 02, 2011, 10:40:31 pm »
Quote from: ICE HOCKEY on August 02, 2011, 10:38:06 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on August 02, 2011, 09:43:36 pm
The latest Quinnipiac poll: Casey's approval rating is at 48% and disapproval is at 29%. 47% say that he deserves to be re-elected while 33% say he doesn't. 47% would vote for Casey compared to 35% that would vote for a generic Republican.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1327.xml?ReleaseID=1630
This just confirms that we'll need a very weak Obama to have a chance at winning here and even then it's probably unlikely (especially since numbers like these will continue to keep major candidates out of the race).
I would say unless you guys can get Tom Ridge, there's virtually no shot. Rohrer has no shot at the Philadelphia suburbs.
Rohrer isn't even necessarily running.
Saying there is virtually no shot isn't wise at all. Nobodies have been able to taken down the supposedly mighty "unbeatable" before when the environment is right. I just don't think it's likely.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Casey getting a more serious opponent?
«
Reply #151 on:
August 04, 2011, 05:14:05 pm »
Well, this could be serious - former Congressional candidate and businessman Steve Welch might run against Casey -
http://www.politico.com/blogs/davidcatanese/0811/Is_Casey_closer_to_a_serious_challenger.html
I've been critical of the guy in the past. This was the guy that was initially running for Congress in the 7th Congressional district then got out when Pat Meehan got in. He decided to run in the 6th (which was, at the time, an open seat because Gerlach was running for Governor) but dropped out again when Gerlach returned. Stuff like that didn't help him with politicos around here but he does have a great resume and would certainly be the strongest possible challenger out of the current group.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7725
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #152 on:
August 04, 2011, 05:15:32 pm »
What about Tom Ridge?
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #153 on:
August 04, 2011, 05:17:50 pm »
Quote from: Emile Hirsch on August 04, 2011, 05:15:32 pm
What about Tom Ridge?
He won't do it. He apparently doesn't have the desire to serve in the Senate. I think Welch or Loiselle (known for starting a medical technology business) are very likely to be the most credible candidates we will find for 2012.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
Posts: 11992
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #154 on:
August 05, 2011, 08:09:49 am »
How about Dino Rossi?
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
YaBB God
Posts: 2923
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #155 on:
August 05, 2011, 01:59:22 pm »
Does anyone see this race becoming competitive besides Phil?
Logged
Economic score: -6.26
Social score: -7.74
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #156 on:
August 05, 2011, 06:11:11 pm »
It is probably the least likely of the competitive races. Casey is one of those races where, it there is a widespread collapse in the Democrats, it becomes competitive. 2010 was not strong enough.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #157 on:
August 06, 2011, 01:01:36 am »
Quote from: Tommy Carcetti on August 05, 2011, 01:59:22 pm
Does anyone see this race becoming competitive besides Phil?
Ok, I never said anything about the race becoming competitive. Take the trolling elsewhere. Thanks.
Quote from: J. J. on August 05, 2011, 06:11:11 pm
It is probably the least likely of the competitive races. Casey is one of those races where, it there is a widespread collapse in the Democrats, it becomes competitive. 2010 was not strong enough.
Yeah, exactly. Pretty much what I've been saying throughout the thread yet I apparently see it becoming competitive according to some joke posters.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Tim Burns to take on Casey?
«
Reply #158 on:
August 13, 2011, 12:17:42 am »
Another more serious challenger could be emerging and it's
another
former (2010) Congressional candidate and businessman: Tim Burns from PA 12 -
http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2011/08/tim-burns-met-w.php
Strangely enough, I did think of him as a candidate not too long ago but after two tough loses to Critz (the General being closer than expected. Only a 51% to 59% loss), I figured he was done with politics and wouldn't even consider it. I'm glad he sat down with the NRSC.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
CultureKing
YaBB God
Posts: 3239
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #159 on:
August 13, 2011, 02:34:37 am »
So Burns wants to become the new Dino Rossi?
Logged
Econ: -6.50, Social: -5.23
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #160 on:
August 13, 2011, 10:07:32 am »
Quote from: CultureKing on August 13, 2011, 02:34:37 am
So Burns wants to become the new Dino Rossi?
No, no. Burns lost fair and square in his first race.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #161 on:
September 06, 2011, 10:45:50 pm »
Congressman Tim Murphy won't run -
http://www.observer-reporter.com/or/story11/08-31-2011-tim-murphy-visit
In other news, I've heard from a close source that former State Representative and 2010 Gubernatorial candidate Sam Rohrer will be announcing his candidacy within a few weeks. He's far more well known across the state when compared to the rest of the field so he'll be the frontrunner. I'm also hearing that Tim Burns (the guy I want to run) is preparing for a run as well.
With so many candidates appealing to conservative voters, the thought is that a decent path to the nomination is emerging for former Congressional candidate Steve Welch (who is more moderate when compared to the rest of the field). The rest of the field consists of a former Santorum staffer, a Tea Party leader, a retired coal mining company owner, a well known former State Representative (Rohrer), a business consultant/former Congressional candidate from the 1980s and a distinguished Army veteran. Burns, who isn't yet in the race, would further split the vote. That definitely could be enough for Welch.
Fun fact about Welch and Burns: both were Congressional candidates in 2010 and both are biotech executives.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Senator Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
Posts: 11012
Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -3.13
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #162 on:
September 07, 2011, 03:17:23 pm »
If Santorum drops out early enough (after Iowa), a rematch would be interesting.
Logged
Quote from: BushKenya on May 24, 2013, 02:30:04 pm
Anyway, does it really matter at this point? I still lost 2 pounds as a result of the 4 sloppy joes.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #163 on:
September 07, 2011, 04:02:49 pm »
Quote from: Snowstalker on September 07, 2011, 03:17:23 pm
If Santorum drops out early enough (after Iowa), a rematch would be interesting.
Iowa is late this year and since our primary is earlier in Presidential election years, the filing deadline is earlier. I don't know if he'd make it.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #164 on:
September 13, 2011, 10:10:02 pm »
Welch has confirmed that he's running and has already assembled an all star team: former Santorum strategist and political consultant John Brabender and former Corbett Campaign Manager Brian Nutt. Toomey's 2010 Field Director and Pawlenty for President staffer (a friend of mine) is also joining them. He's going to have more difficulty winning over the base but with all of the others running, it might not be too much of an issue.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
J. J.
YaBB God
Posts: 31872
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #165 on:
September 14, 2011, 02:51:57 pm »
I basically list Casey as the 14th seat. There would be about 13 others to go before he loses.
Logged
J. J.
"Actually, .. now that you mention it...."
- Londo Molari
"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke
"Wa sala, wa lala."
(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #166 on:
September 15, 2011, 09:12:25 am »
By the way, Brabender being on board with Welch is the sign that Santorum doesn't intend to leave the Presidential race to set up a rematch with Casey.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
This could be big: Pat Meehan for Senate?
«
Reply #167 on:
September 16, 2011, 01:16:02 pm »
He'd be giving up a seat that he'd likely win re-election to for a tougher challenge but the risk might pay off -
http://www.delcotimes.com/articles/2011/09/16/news/doc4e72bc962d92c253852817.txt?viewmode=fullstory
I'd certainly be on board.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Landslide Lyndon
px75
YaBB God
Posts: 8517
Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -5.22
Re: This could be big: Pat Meehan for Senate?
«
Reply #168 on:
September 16, 2011, 01:32:28 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on September 16, 2011, 01:16:02 pm
He'd be giving up a seat that he'd likely win re-election to for a tougher challenge but the risk might pay off -
http://www.delcotimes.com/articles/2011/09/16/news/doc4e72bc962d92c253852817.txt?viewmode=fullstory
Maybe, but he'll make the life far easier for the map-drawers and his colleagues.
Logged
Bob Findley
: "You're a real dyed-in-the-wool son-of-a-bitch. Anyone ever told you that?"
Steve Everett
: "Just close friends and family,"
Clint Eastwood's "True Crime", 1999.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #169 on:
September 17, 2011, 09:43:09 pm »
At this weekend's PA GOP State Committee meeting, Burns said that he's serious about a Senate run and that a decision should be reached by the end of this month -
http://www.politicspa.com/exclusive-burns-likely-to-run-for-u-s-senate/27874/
Unless Meehan runs, Burns is my choice.
In other news, Scranton Tea Party leader Laureen Cummings announced her candidacy today.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Jayhawker
tmthforu94
YaBB God
Posts: 15946
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #170 on:
September 17, 2011, 10:37:51 pm »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on September 17, 2011, 09:43:09 pm
At this weekend's PA GOP State Committee meeting, Burns said that he's serious about a Senate run and that a decision should be reached by the end of this month -
http://www.politicspa.com/exclusive-burns-likely-to-run-for-u-s-senate/27874/
Unless Meehan runs, Burns is my choice.
In other news, Scranton Tea Party leader Laureen Cummings announced her candidacy today.
http://yrnetwork.com/websites/default.aspx?id=3145
Endorsed. It'll be tough, but she can certainly pull this off.
Logged
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
-Jackie Robinson
Quote from: John_Engle on November 02, 2012, 04:25:37 pm
Tmthforu94
You are very kind my Friend. Thank you and God bless the people like You.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #171 on:
September 18, 2011, 09:55:07 am »
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on September 17, 2011, 10:37:51 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on September 17, 2011, 09:43:09 pm
At this weekend's PA GOP State Committee meeting, Burns said that he's serious about a Senate run and that a decision should be reached by the end of this month -
http://www.politicspa.com/exclusive-burns-likely-to-run-for-u-s-senate/27874/
Unless Meehan runs, Burns is my choice.
In other news, Scranton Tea Party leader Laureen Cummings announced her candidacy today.
http://yrnetwork.com/websites/default.aspx?id=3145
Endorsed. It'll be tough, but she can certainly pull this off.
Uh, you certainly wouldn't be endorsing her. Believe me. Though I'm guessing you know that with your wink. There's a reason why I don't have much to say about her here.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Jayhawker
tmthforu94
YaBB God
Posts: 15946
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #172 on:
September 19, 2011, 09:32:03 am »
Quote from: Keystone Phil on September 18, 2011, 09:55:07 am
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on September 17, 2011, 10:37:51 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on September 17, 2011, 09:43:09 pm
At this weekend's PA GOP State Committee meeting, Burns said that he's serious about a Senate run and that a decision should be reached by the end of this month -
http://www.politicspa.com/exclusive-burns-likely-to-run-for-u-s-senate/27874/
Unless Meehan runs, Burns is my choice.
In other news, Scranton Tea Party leader Laureen Cummings announced her candidacy today.
http://yrnetwork.com/websites/default.aspx?id=3145
Endorsed. It'll be tough, but she can certainly pull this off.
Uh, you certainly wouldn't be endorsing her. Believe me. Though I'm guessing you know that with your wink. There's a reason why I don't have much to say about her here.
Look on my Facebook profile for a good laugh, Phil. I almost died when I saw it.
Let's just say, I got contacted be a Senatorial candidate.
Logged
A life is not important except in the impact it has on other lives.
-Jackie Robinson
Quote from: John_Engle on November 02, 2012, 04:25:37 pm
Tmthforu94
You are very kind my Friend. Thank you and God bless the people like You.
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #173 on:
September 19, 2011, 11:32:49 pm »
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on September 19, 2011, 09:32:03 am
Look on my Facebook profile for a good laugh, Phil. I almost died when I saw it.
Let's just say, I got contacted be a Senatorial candidate.
Uh, wow.
Wow
. I have a friend that is fairly good friends with her, too.
Anyway, here's a good article from Politico talking about how crowded the field is and how it might lead to a nasty battle between the Tea Party and establishment factions -
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=BB71EF86-078F-4970-9185-E4F796DDEB95
In a weird way, I'm a mix of both (certainly not "establishment" in the sense that I'm an old school, smoke filled room type or a RINO). I think Burns is the closest thing to that, too. Everyone else seems solidly in one of the other two camps.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
Posts: 49400
Re: Pennsylvania 2012: Casey's Challenge
«
Reply #174 on:
October 12, 2011, 09:36:08 am »
Steve Welch teases that he has an important announcement on Facebook within the next 24 hours. He'll almost certainly be entering the race.
Logged
Quote from: Representative Wyodon on May 06, 2013, 04:31:05 pm
And you're a f
u
cking asshole. How about you try actually contributing something to a debate at some point, or are you too busy kissing Rick Santorum's ass?
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
[
7
]
8
9
10
11
12
...
14
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...