Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 12:27:02 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  2016 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  So... is Santorum next in line for 2016?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Will Santorum be the GOP nominee in 2016?
Yes   -11 (28.2%)
No   -28 (71.8%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: So... is Santorum next in line for 2016?  (Read 978 times)
retromike22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1233
United States


View Profile
« on: April 15, 2012, 01:12:40 am »
Ignore

The next in line pattern in the Republican nomination seems to have continued into 2012. Will it work again in 2016?
Logged
President John Hay
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4738
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2012, 02:14:29 am »
Ignore

He is making the right moves after exiting... visiting NRA, conference call with supporters, etc
Logged

○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31174


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2012, 02:24:38 am »
Ignore

Well, the only time it didn't happen with the modern primary system is when George W Bush stole Buchanan's turn.
Logged
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3643
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2012, 06:11:49 am »
Ignore

Well, the only time it didn't happen with the modern primary system is when George W Bush stole Buchanan's turn.
'
Too bad. A Buchanan campaign would have been interesting to watch Wink
Logged

Every time I see Denmark I just want to punch it in the face...
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5300
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2012, 08:39:06 am »
Ignore

As jfern said, Buchanan was the only non-next in line in the modern era, and Santorum has actually held elective office, but I can't see them nominating him.
Logged
--
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36851
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2012, 09:04:57 am »
Ignore

As jfern said, Buchanan was the only non-next in line in the modern era, and Santorum has actually held elective office, but I can't see them nominating him.

Never underestimate the GOP electorate.

November 2012 (after Obama is projected to be reelected):

Oh no! It's because we nominated a moderate again! Sad Let's have a true conservative in 2016!
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10461


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 15, 2012, 09:19:24 am »
Ignore

No.

Santorum is too polarizing and too, well, wacky.
Logged




WORST PRESIDENT
SINCE WORLD WAR II
Emperor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18707
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: -5.74

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2012, 10:14:59 am »
Ignore

He'll still be young enough to run in 2016 and would already have half the base behind him at that time, so I'd say yes.
Logged

#Ready4Nixon
Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14927
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2012, 11:27:51 am »
Ignore

By 2016, he's been out of office for ten years and the last time he's won an actual election is frickin' 16 years ago. If he really is next in line, God help us.
Logged

--
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36851
View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2012, 11:40:10 am »
Ignore

No.

Santorum is too polarizing and too, well, wacky.

So, 2012 field was pathetic indeed: a choice between a polarizing wacko and a man with charisma of wet wiper.
Logged
Chris B
cb48026
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 667


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2012, 12:54:32 pm »
Ignore

He'll probably have a pretty good chance if he runs. Especially if the base really gets sucked into the "everytime we nominate a moderate, we lose" mindset, and Christie comes across as too much of a Romney redux.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4466
Thailand


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 15, 2012, 02:19:18 pm »
Ignore

Good chance.
Logged
NHI
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3223


P
View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 15, 2012, 02:25:44 pm »
Ignore

No.

Santorum is too polarizing and too, well, wacky.

Agreed. If he is nominated, say hello to Pres. Clinton, Cuomo, Schweitzer or someone else.
Logged

‎"Our president thinks this country's in decline. It is if he's president. It's not if I'm president." -- Mitt Romney

Cobbler
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 808
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 15, 2012, 03:22:25 pm »
Ignore

Santorum was a last resort this time. I don't think he'll be able to pull it off against other big conservative names.
Logged


Quote
Economic score: +2.19
Social score: -5.74
Mr. Morden
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18889
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2012, 03:59:00 pm »

No, of course not.  Santorum is more like Buchanan than he is like Bush, Dole, McCain, Romney, etc., in that the party establishment doesn't like him, and will go with someone else.  Christie, Rubio, McDonnell, and Ryan are all far more likely to be nominated than him.
Logged

HOG & Blondie: A Tale of Atlas Future

What is your opinion of this thread?

Watch Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Bull Moose Base
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2582


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2012, 04:17:35 pm »
Ignore

Iowa becomes more irrelevant for the GOP each cycle, Florida more influential.  Winning Florida might be diminished a bit if Rubio or Jeb had homefield advanatge but even so, that plus already being well-positioned to dominate the invisible primary...  One of the more interesting dynamics of 2016 is you have two legacies in Jeb and Hillary as speculated frontrunners and their proteges as two other speculated frontrunners in Rubio and Cuomo (Cuomo of Bill Clinton; Gillibrand is more of a Hillary protege).  I wonder if the symmetry could lead to bipartisan support for scrapping that fairly useless constitutional penalty on same-state running mates.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4768
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2012, 04:26:56 pm »
Ignore

Eh, I hope Santorum's not the next in line. Could you imagine the embarrassment of a Clinton-Santorum match-up?

I know the focus was always "Mitt has a problem with the very conservative," but the opposite could be said of Santorum, and I think it's much more damaging: Santorum has a problem with moderates, Democrats, and liberals.

Personally, I would throw my full support behind Hillary if Santorum was the nominee. And I bet a lot of moderate Republicans would too. Hillary is a strong leader, and half the problem people have with Obama is that he's not. She'd be a force against meek little Santorum.
Logged

Cobbler
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 808
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2012, 06:19:34 pm »
Ignore

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.
Logged


Quote
Economic score: +2.19
Social score: -5.74
SJoyce of Harrenhal
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8790
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2012, 06:34:20 pm »
Ignore

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.

Just thinking about a Santorum administration... Hey, HagridOfTheDeep, any room in Canada?
Logged

LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4466
Thailand


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2012, 03:19:24 am »
Ignore

If Mitt Romney could be next in line, Santorum can be too, especially if he can hire someone to coach him how to say conservative things without being that controversial. Also a bag or two of money could help.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4768
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2012, 12:55:34 pm »
Ignore

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.

Just thinking about a Santorum administration... Hey, HagridOfTheDeep, any room in Canada?

Haha, you bet there is. But I can't see a libertarian lasting too long in Canada. Tongue
Logged

Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14247
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: 3.65

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2012, 02:13:11 pm »
Ignore

Well, Romney's VP choice may be the GOP heir-apparent in 2016. I think Santorum is in a good position for 2016 though.
Logged


HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4768
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 3.35, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 16, 2012, 04:05:40 pm »
Ignore

Or the veep candidate will be the fake heir-apparent, ala Sarah Palin.

I guess that would rely on Romney making a controversial pick, which is sort of unlikely. Even Gov. Martinez or Sen. Rubio wouldn't be as controversial as Palin.
Logged

SJoyce of Harrenhal
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8790
United States


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 16, 2012, 04:38:27 pm »
Ignore

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.

Just thinking about a Santorum administration... Hey, HagridOfTheDeep, any room in Canada?

Haha, you bet there is. But I can't see a libertarian lasting too long in Canada. Tongue

Even in Alberta or something?
Logged

Nagas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1606
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.58, S: -7.65

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 16, 2012, 05:11:19 pm »
Ignore

Well, Romney's VP choice may be the GOP heir-apparent in 2016. I think Santorum is in a good position for 2016 though.

This. If the VP is controversial to the base or forgoes a run, Santorum could easily be a top contender.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines