Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP? Round 8
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 11, 2024, 06:53:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP? Round 8
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP?
#1
Julian Castro (TX)
 
#2
Martin Heinrich (NM)
 
#3
Tim Kaine (VA)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 81

Author Topic: Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP? Round 8  (Read 2645 times)
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,464
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 22, 2015, 02:44:48 AM »

Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP? Every 4 days the candidates with the lowest votes will be removed. The first candidate to 50% wins. In this round, you can vote for 1 candidate. You can always change your vote before the poll ends.

Results from last week: https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=213016.0

Advanced:
Tim Kaine (VA)        (33%)
Martin Heinrich (NM)     (27.7%)
Julian Castro (TX)     (22.3%)

Eliminated:
Sherrod Brown (OH)    (17%)
Logged
Cryptic
Shadowlord88
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 891


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2015, 04:23:25 AM »

Kaine
Logged
AelroseB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 279


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2015, 04:53:58 AM »

Kaine.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2015, 05:28:17 AM »

Come on, vote for Heinrich!
Logged
RFK Jr.’s Brain Worm
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,765
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2015, 09:17:00 AM »

Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2015, 09:22:01 AM »

Heinrich or Castro
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 89,114
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2015, 09:32:21 AM »


One of Obama's blunders when he had 60 votes in senate; was not passing inmigration reform. Which further enhanced the GOP takeover.

She is determined in some fashion, to give Latinos more enhancement over work visas and citizenship.




Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2015, 09:38:41 AM »

If Castro can survive a serious and rigorous vetting process, you have to go with him. He's the only one of the three that has the potential to be elected President in 2024, even if Hillary isn't re-elected.. But you have to make sure he can handle a tough debate and be a serious candidate.

Heinrich or Kaine would basically be Al Gore.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,546
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2015, 09:58:10 AM »

Heinrich
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,666
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 22, 2015, 12:53:48 PM »

Kaine. He can win the presidency in 2024.
Logged
Türkisblau
H_Wallace
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,401
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 22, 2015, 12:58:05 PM »

Kaine. He can win the presidency in 2024.

Surely you aren't arguing that Democrats will hold the presidency for 5 straight terms?
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 22, 2015, 01:17:01 PM »

Of the three, Kaine.

He's pretty qualified and familiar with the national spotlight.
Logged
WVdemocrat
DimpledChad
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 954
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 22, 2015, 01:28:41 PM »

Kaine. He can win the presidency in 2024.

Eh, I doubt it. Democrats are going to want someone younger and new by then.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 22, 2015, 04:26:18 PM »

Logged
Brewer
BrewerPaul
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,622


Political Matrix
E: -6.90, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 22, 2015, 04:34:14 PM »

Heinrich
Logged
Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,791
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 22, 2015, 05:24:38 PM »

Kaine.
Logged
henster
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,004


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 22, 2015, 05:29:23 PM »

What does Heinrich bring to the ticket? He's a very low key Senator, not an ethnic, only speaks one language, no military background and his seat would be go to a Republican. If you want a young Senator I'd go with Chris Murphy or Brian Schatz both of their seats would be secure.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 22, 2015, 05:42:14 PM »

If Castro can survive a serious and rigorous vetting process, you have to go with him. He's the only one of the three that has the potential to be elected President in 2024, even if Hillary isn't re-elected.. But you have to make sure he can handle a tough debate and be a serious candidate.

Heinrich or Kaine would basically be Al Gore.

Do you really think that matters?

Let's look at recent history.

2008:  Even if Bush had an electable VP, like Hagel or Bill Frist, being Bush's VP only would have hurt their chances. 

2000:  Being VP probably hurt Al Gore in the 2000 election because he was too worried about morality and dignity to run on the economy. 

1988:  Kind of a hollow victory because Bush lost in 1992 and he had to deal with Iran Contra in 1988.

There is some upside to picking a rising star as your VP, because you elevate their profile for the next election, sure.  But, if they're such a star, they could get the necessary profile to run on their own.  (Obviously, Castro has problems with that because he can't win a Senate race in Texas)

On the downside, think of all the clunker VP candidates we've had recently, Ryan, Edwards, Palin, Quayle.  There's more risk with those younger, more unknown candidates.

So, I would just pick a boring, but competent and well-liked person.  Or, more importantly, the best person for the job of White House advisor and vague senior figure.  The political stuff will take care of itself if you pick the best person for the job.
Logged
Panhandle Progressive
politicaljunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 855
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 22, 2015, 06:03:13 PM »

Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 22, 2015, 06:44:09 PM »

Heinrich, not for the future Presidential angle but for the fact that he isn't a potential landmine for inexperience like Castro or a political incompetent like Kaine.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 22, 2015, 06:48:03 PM »

If Castro can survive a serious and rigorous vetting process, you have to go with him. He's the only one of the three that has the potential to be elected President in 2024, even if Hillary isn't re-elected.. But you have to make sure he can handle a tough debate and be a serious candidate.

Heinrich or Kaine would basically be Al Gore.

Do you really think that matters?

Let's look at recent history.

2008:  Even if Bush had an electable VP, like Hagel or Bill Frist, being Bush's VP only would have hurt their chances. 

2000:  Being VP probably hurt Al Gore in the 2000 election because he was too worried about morality and dignity to run on the economy. 

1988:  Kind of a hollow victory because Bush lost in 1992 and he had to deal with Iran Contra in 1988.

There is some upside to picking a rising star as your VP, because you elevate their profile for the next election, sure.  But, if they're such a star, they could get the necessary profile to run on their own.  (Obviously, Castro has problems with that because he can't win a Senate race in Texas)

On the downside, think of all the clunker VP candidates we've had recently, Ryan, Edwards, Palin, Quayle.  There's more risk with those younger, more unknown candidates.

So, I would just pick a boring, but competent and well-liked person.  Or, more importantly, the best person for the job of White House advisor and vague senior figure.  The political stuff will take care of itself if you pick the best person for the job.
Hmm, that raises an interesting point. An advantage with Castro is that it gives the Democrats a national Hispanic figure without him having to win a statewide election in Texas. He could use it to run for President in later cycles.
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 22, 2015, 09:51:03 PM »

If Castro can survive a serious and rigorous vetting process, you have to go with him. He's the only one of the three that has the potential to be elected President in 2024

You really think that declaring someone the inevitable and only possible winner nine years out is the brightest idea?
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,793


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 24, 2015, 03:41:56 PM »

The guy who was DNC chair when the Democrats had a net loss of 63 House seats is leading? LOL.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 24, 2015, 03:43:55 PM »

The guy who was DNC chair when the Democrats had a net loss of 63 House seats is leading? LOL.
I don't understand this forum's obsession with Tim Kaine.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 24, 2015, 03:50:13 PM »

Heinrich.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 13 queries.