FBI Reviewing Clinton emails news: LATEST - Emails from Weiner investigation

[zorkpolitics]

Good Grief, Weiner had 650,000 emails!

It will take months to find out if any contain classified information before they are released to the public or if they have incriminated information about Clinton.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/laptop-may-include-thousands-of-emails-linked-to-hillary-clintons-private-server-1477854957

[Edu]

It is amazing how much fun one can have with a fun

?

[IceSpear]

Wait what? There's "explosive evidence" of ties between Trump's advisors and the Russian government?

I wonder why Comey hasn't publicized that at all.

Do you really wonder?

[Green Line]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/30/politics/clinton-emails-fbi-abedin/index.html

Interesting.

Just makes Comey look even worse.

So what is it.  Comey acted too fast and before he know what was going on, or he was too slow and should have revealed it sooner.  You guys are making my head spin!

It looks like he deliberately held back releasing information to influence the election(which he wasn't even required to release). If Comey released this 5 weeks ago, none of us would be complaining.

"By early October, it was clear to investigators that the emails may relate to the Clinton email server investigation, law enforcement officials said."

Yeah, if this came out in early October Democrats would have been totally cool with it!  Give me a break folks.

WaPo's sources say Comey didn't know

The FBI agents investigating Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server knew early this month that messages recovered in a separate probe might be germane to their case, but they waited weeks before briefing the FBI director, according to people familiar with the case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-agents-knew-of-clinton-related-emails-weeks-before-director-was-briefed/2016/10/30/657ed266-9eb1-11e6-8d63-3e0a660f1f04_story.html

Sounds like they didn't trust him with this "information". Hence his botched and panic-ridden reaction.

Literally nothing in the article suggests that they did not trust him with the information.

[OneJ]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

[komodozer]

Good Grief, Weiner had 650,000 emails!

Pimpin' ain't easy.

[Green Line]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

[IceSpear]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

No more partisan intentions than Comey (R) does.

[Green Line]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

No more partisan intentions than Comey (R) does.

Maybe.  Except that Comey has demonstrated in the past year that he can act independently of his partisan affiliation in his role.

[Speed of Sound]

Bonier seems intrigued by the fact that Reid claims that Comey and the FBI possess "explosive information about close ties and coordination" between Trump campaign & Russian government. We'll see if there's anything in that...something next week on it?

[JerryArkansas]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

No more partisan intentions than Comey (R) does.

Maybe.  Except that Comey has demonstrated in the past year that he can act independently of his partisan affiliation in his role.

By saying I want to indict Hillary Clinton but have no evidence to do so?

[Green Line]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

No more partisan intentions than Comey (R) does.

Maybe.  Except that Comey has demonstrated in the past year that he can act independently of his partisan affiliation in his role.

By saying I want to indict Hillary Clinton but have no evidence to do so?

Yes, actually.

[IceSpear]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

No more partisan intentions than Comey (R) does.

Maybe.  Except that Comey has demonstrated in the past year that he can act independently of his partisan affiliation in his role.

By saying I want to indict Hillary Clinton but have no evidence to do so?

Presumably by slandering and besmirching the reputation of an individual he had no intention of prosecuting, which goes against all FBI precedent and decorum.

[JerryArkansas]

Harry Reid: FBI Director’s ‘Partisan Actions’ May Violate Federal Law

Link: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/10/30/harry-reid-comeys-partisan-actions-may-violate-federal-law/

And I'm sure Harry Reid has no "partisan" intentions in saying this.  Lol.  Not really a reliable source atm.

No more partisan intentions than Comey (R) does.

Maybe.  Except that Comey has demonstrated in the past year that he can act independently of his partisan affiliation in his role.

By saying I want to indict Hillary Clinton but have no evidence to do so?

Yes, actually.

That shows the exact opposite, what world do you live in.

[mark_twain]

So two days after the initial story came out on Friday, it has now become a story pointing against the person who started it in the first place, James Comey.

Moreover, this is the same person who is the source of most of the negative opinion directed at Clinton, with his investigation of her e-mails.

This looks like an effective strategy by the Clinton campaign. If they can discredit the judgement of James Comey, then they can counter not only the effects of Friday's e-mail story, but also the entire e-mail story itself, from the beginning.

[Speed of Sound]

Bonier's now mentioned this point twice. Wonder if there's an ace up the sleeve. Seems like a dangerous claim by Reid otherwise.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Doimper]

[img width=438 height=780]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CwDD3wFVIAEls7_.jpg:large[img]

Wait what? There's "explosive evidence" of ties between Trump's advisors and the Russian government?

I wonder why Comey hasn't publicized that at all.

Do you really wonder?

Of course not

[Southern Delegate matthew27]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/opinion/on-clinton-emails-did-the-fbi-director-abuse-his-power.html

"And that is why, on Saturday, I filed a complaint against the F.B.I. with the Office of Special Counsel, which investigates Hatch Act violations, and with the Office of Government Ethics. I have spent much of my career working on government ethics and lawyers’ ethics, including two and a half years as the chief White House ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush, and I never thought that the F.B.I. could be dragged into a political circus surrounding one of its investigations. Until this week. For the sake of full disclosure, in this election I have supported Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich and Hillary Clinton for president, in that order."

And according to the WashPost,
" there is only one penalty, as I understand it, for violation of the Hatch Act for a federal employee. And that is removal. "

[Meclazine for Israel]

FoxNews are reporting Weiner laptop has emails from Hillary Clintons state.gov account.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/comey-s-review-emails-related-to-clinton-server-triggered-by-ny-agents-source-says.html

The question is "Did Amthony Weiner email Hillary any pictures?"

If Weiner emailed his weiner to secretary Clinton, i am changing my vote from Clinton to Trump.

[Crumpets]

FoxNews are reporting Weiner laptop has emails from Hillary Clintons state.gov account.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/comey-s-review-emails-related-to-clinton-server-triggered-by-ny-agents-source-says.html

The question is "Did Amthony Weiner email Hillary any pictures?"

If Weiner emailed his weiner to secretary Clinton, i am changing my vote from Clinton to Trump.

Why would this be a deciding factor? What would it say about Clinton if she had a well-known weirdo e-mail her dick picks? That's like not voting for Reagan in '84 because he was in possession of a bullet owned by John Hinckley Jr. - I hear that guy was an assassin!

[Landslide Lyndon]

FoxNews are reporting Weiner laptop has emails from Hillary Clintons state.gov account.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/comey-s-review-emails-related-to-clinton-server-triggered-by-ny-agents-source-says.html

The question is "Did Amthony Weiner email Hillary any pictures?"

If Weiner emailed his weiner to secretary Clinton, i am changing my vote from Clinton to Trump.

Why would this be a deciding factor? What would it say about Clinton if she had a well-known weirdo e-mail her dick picks? That's like not voting for Reagan in '84 because he was in possession of a bullet owned by John Hinckley Jr. - I hear that guy was an assassin!

He is trolling.

[ApatheticAustrian]

not only Harry claims the Trump-Putin connection.

National Security journalist/consultant John Schindler confirms it is true.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

https://twitter.com/20committee/status/792860541672943618

this election is.....crazy.

[Meclazine for Israel]

Weiner jokes never get old.

I have a couple more pearlers for this thread.

I will save them for pages 64 and 83.

[Crumpets]

FoxNews are reporting Weiner laptop has emails from Hillary Clintons state.gov account.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/comey-s-review-emails-related-to-clinton-server-triggered-by-ny-agents-source-says.html

The question is "Did Amthony Weiner email Hillary any pictures?"

If Weiner emailed his weiner to secretary Clinton, i am changing my vote from Clinton to Trump.

Why would this be a deciding factor? What would it say about Clinton if she had a well-known weirdo e-mail her dick picks? That's like not voting for Reagan in '84 because he was in possession of a bullet owned by John Hinckley Jr. - I hear that guy was an assassin!

He is trolling.

I can never tell with the likes of Meclazine.

[Erich Maria Remarque]

FoxNews are reporting Weiner laptop has emails from Hillary Clintons state.gov account.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/30/comey-s-review-emails-related-to-clinton-server-triggered-by-ny-agents-source-says.html

The question is "Did Amthony Weiner email Hillary any pictures?"

If Weiner emailed his weiner to secretary Clinton, i am changing my vote from Clinton to Trump.

It is happening...