Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2013, 12:56:58 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  Special Election for IL-5
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print
Author Topic: Special Election for IL-5  (Read 8506 times)
JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6854


View Profile
« Reply #75 on: April 07, 2009, 08:06:56 pm »
Ignore

I haven't seen results this shocking since Jackie Speier was elected.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6700


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #76 on: April 07, 2009, 08:13:49 pm »
Ignore

Come on Rosanna stay over 20%, that will make it a mandate.
Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7089


View Profile
« Reply #77 on: April 07, 2009, 08:21:48 pm »
Ignore

Precincts Reported: 463 of 578 (80.1%)
X Mike Quigley (D)   24,369 (69.4%)
Rosanna Pulido (R)   8,435   (24.0%)
Matt Reichel (G)   2,332   (6.6%)

Come on Rosanna stay over 20%, that will make it a mandate.

Mandate for what?  Not totally blowing a special election with especially low turnout?
Logged
Lunar
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30756
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #78 on: April 07, 2009, 08:25:45 pm »
Ignore

i'm more interested in CA-32 now.  Glancing at Chu's website, it's weird she includes the headline "California Race May Expose Ethnic Rifts"

http://www.judychu.net/PDF/rollcall022409.pdf
Logged

this is real
Rowan
RowanBrandon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6700


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

View Profile
« Reply #79 on: April 07, 2009, 08:28:56 pm »
Ignore

Precincts Reported: 463 of 578 (80.1%)
X Mike Quigley (D)   24,369 (69.4%)
Rosanna Pulido (R)   8,435   (24.0%)
Matt Reichel (G)   2,332   (6.6%)

Come on Rosanna stay over 20%, that will make it a mandate.

Mandate for what?  Not totally blowing a special election with especially low turnout?

Clearly this is a referendum against Obama.
Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7089


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: April 07, 2009, 08:31:56 pm »
Ignore

Precincts Reported: 463 of 578 (80.1%)
X Mike Quigley (D)   24,369 (69.4%)
Rosanna Pulido (R)   8,435   (24.0%)
Matt Reichel (G)   2,332   (6.6%)

Come on Rosanna stay over 20%, that will make it a mandate.

Mandate for what?  Not totally blowing a special election with especially low turnout?

Clearly this is a referendum against Obama.

Clearly this is a special election with extremely low turnout in a heavily Democrat-leaning district that has little meaning outside IL-5.

Anyway, 84.1% in:
Precincts Reported: 486 of 578
X Mike Quigley (D)   25,563 (69.3%)
Rosanna Pulido (R)   8,893   (24.1%)
Matt Reichel (G)   2,435   (6.6%)
Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7089


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: April 07, 2009, 09:03:05 pm »
Ignore

With almost 94% in:
Precincts Reported: 543 of 578 (93.9%)
X Mike Quigley (D)   28,343 (69.7%)
Rosanna Pulido (R)   9,653   (23.7%)
Matt Reichel (G)   2,691   (6.6%)
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10689


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51

View Profile
« Reply #82 on: April 07, 2009, 11:36:25 pm »
Ignore

With 572 of 578 precincts reporting:

Quigley     30,109
Pulico        10,509
Reichel        2,868

The six precincts still outstanding are all Chicago precincts and all from wards 1 (precinct 7), 31 (precincts 15 and 28), 40 (precinct 23) and 43 (precincts 29 and 53)
Logged

Registered in Arizona for Fantasy election purposes.
Holmes
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6520
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: April 08, 2009, 07:19:49 am »
Ignore

Clearly this is a referendum against Obama.
Clearly this is a referendum against Mike Quigley and Rosanna Pulido. Tongue
Logged

muon2
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6948


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: April 08, 2009, 09:48:32 am »
Ignore

Clearly this is a referendum against Obama.
Clearly this is a referendum against Mike Quigley and Rosanna Pulido. Tongue

The primary and the general have been referenda against the recent tax and fee hikes by the Cook County board. Quigley had been the obvious outspoken critic in the primary, and Democrats as whole wore some generic blame (taxes along with the newest Blago indictment) in the general.
Logged



The high precision muon g-2 storage ring moving to Fermilab.
Vasall des Midas
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 56537
Vatican City State


View Profile
« Reply #85 on: April 08, 2009, 02:19:02 pm »
Ignore

What kind of Green is Matt Reichel?
Logged

Liberate yourself from Free Will


Kitty's beardgrowing advice to Mitty.
Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14252
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #86 on: April 08, 2009, 07:57:09 pm »
Ignore

What kind of Green is Matt Reichel?

a youngin' that ran in the Democratic primary until he couldn't get enough signatures.
Logged

Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8531
United States


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: April 09, 2009, 08:14:26 am »
Ignore

I knew I recognized Pulido's name from somewhere previously. Sure enough:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=1532

A freeper and enough of an anti-immigrant extremist to be profiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Nice.
Logged
cinyc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7089


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: April 09, 2009, 07:22:59 pm »
Ignore

I knew I recognized Pulido's name from somewhere previously. Sure enough:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=1532

A freeper and enough of an anti-immigrant extremist to be profiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Nice.

She's on the hit list of the Southern Policy Law Center.   So what?  Being against illegal immigration is not against the law - yet.  Though if extremist left-wing organizations like the SPLC ever got their way, it would be.
Logged
Badger
badger
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8531
United States


View Profile
« Reply #89 on: April 15, 2009, 12:34:12 pm »
Ignore

I knew I recognized Pulido's name from somewhere previously. Sure enough:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?pid=1532

A freeper and enough of an anti-immigrant extremist to be profiled by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Nice.

She's on the hit list of the Southern Policy Law Center.   So what?  Being against illegal immigration is not against the law - yet.  Though if extremist left-wing organizations like the SPLC ever got their way, it would be.

Pulido's organization, F.A.I.R., hasn't earned its listing as a hate group "because they're opposed to illegal immigration". See the following detailed report from SPLC:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846

Here's a good--almost charitable--summary:

"Founded in 1979, FAIR has long been marked by anti-Latino and anti-Catholic attitudes. It has mixed this bigotry with a fondness for eugenics, the idea of breeding better humans discredited by its Nazi associations. It has accepted $1.2 million from an infamous, racist eugenics foundation. It has employed officials in key positions who are also members of white supremacist groups. Recently, it has promoted racist conspiracy theories about Mexico's secret designs on the American Southwest and an alternative theory alleging secret plans to merge the United States, Mexico and Canada. Just last February, a senior FAIR official sought "advice" from the leaders of a racist Belgian political party."

Even a cursory review of the facts shows FAIR isn't merely opposed to "illegal" immigration, but ANY immigrants (other than white Europeans, of course).

The KKK is a hate group with a detailed unabashed white supremacist philosophy which it has channeled for decades into organized acts of violence and terrorism; FAIR, by contrast, is organized general nativist xenophobia which it channels into racist (but apparently non-violent) invective. With that obvious distinction noted, however, saying FAIR is listed as a hate group simply because it opposes illegal immigration is like saying the Klan is so listed merely because they oppose affirmative action.

Just curious: If the SPLC truly was "an extremist left-wing organization", would it still investigate and list as hate groups various Black Separatist organizations including Nation of Islam? (It does)

Anyhoo, my point to this before jacking the thread (sorry--bad newbie! bad!) was concurring that Pulido's got serious credentials as a wingnut. Not that it mattered as, as has been pointed out, the second coming of Jesus--or even Harry Carey--couldn't win in this district running as a Republican.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory