Redistribution of Federal Electoral Districts 2012
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 18, 2024, 12:00:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Redistribution of Federal Electoral Districts 2012
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49
Author Topic: Redistribution of Federal Electoral Districts 2012  (Read 178436 times)
lilTommy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1100 on: September 30, 2013, 02:43:45 PM »

Big change in Scarborough. The Commission reverts to its first Proposal.

As in the first Proposal, the new Scarborough riding is Scarborough East, but renamed SCARBOROUGH—ROUGE PARK. The successor to Scarborough--Rouge River is Scarborough North.  Scarborough Agincourt is largely unchanged, as is Scarborough Centre, Scarborough Southwest and Scarborough Guildwood. Scarborough--Rouge Park is the 43% of Pickering--Scarborough East that is within Scarborough, plus some leftover parts of Scarborough--Rouge River and Scarborough--Guildwood.

Scarborough--Rouge Park is notionally Liberal, in a three-way race. Scarborough—Guildwood is only marginally Liberal, and might become open if its MP gambles on the new Scarborough--Rouge Park. Scarborough—Agincourt remains Liberal. Scarborough Southwest and Scarborough North remain NDP. Scarborough Centre remains marginally Conservative in a tight three-way race.    
 

Ugh, They Kept University-Rosedale. Terrible decision, just terrible
Spadina- Fort York, should be called Trinity-Fort York; They basically changed Scarborough but nothing else in TO? am i wrong.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,633
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1101 on: September 30, 2013, 02:45:32 PM »

Big change in Scarborough. The Commission reverts to its first Proposal.

As in the first Proposal, the new Scarborough riding is Scarborough East, but renamed SCARBOROUGH—ROUGE PARK. The successor to Scarborough--Rouge River is Scarborough North.  Scarborough Agincourt is largely unchanged, as is Scarborough Centre, Scarborough Southwest and Scarborough Guildwood. Scarborough--Rouge Park is the 43% of Pickering--Scarborough East that is within Scarborough, plus some leftover parts of Scarborough--Rouge River and Scarborough--Guildwood.

Scarborough--Rouge Park is notionally Liberal, in a three-way race. Scarborough—Guildwood is only marginally Liberal, and might become open if its MP gambles on the new Scarborough--Rouge Park. Scarborough—Agincourt remains Liberal. Scarborough Southwest and Scarborough North remain NDP. Scarborough Centre remains marginally Conservative in a tight three-way race.    
 

Ugh, They Kept University-Rosedale. Terrible decision, just terrible
Spadina- Fort York, should be called Trinity-Fort York; They basically changed Scarborough but nothing else in TO? am i wrong.

A small part of Rosedale is moved in Don Valley West.
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1102 on: September 30, 2013, 03:27:44 PM »

The Commission says "The names of the other three urban electoral districts located within the City of Hamilton begin with the name Hamilton. The Commission believes that all four should begin in the same fashion. The electoral district of Ancaster is renamed HAMILTON WEST—ANCASTER—DUNDAS."

But the fifth electoral district located within the City of Hamilton is still named Flamborough-Glanbrook. Not Hamilton--Flamborough--Glanbrook. Why not? Because it's not "urban" even though it's entirely within the City? Are they still fighting amalgamation? Besides, a big chunk of the urban area on the southeast of Hamilton is in Flamborough--Glanbrook, along with 16,000 people in the urban south end of Flamborough. I bet it's more than half urban.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1103 on: September 30, 2013, 07:57:03 PM »

Heh. Looks like my suggestion from last night for Thornhill came true. And I see they added "Oak Ridges" to the Aurora-Richmond Hill riding name like I suggested too.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1104 on: September 30, 2013, 08:15:03 PM »

Here are the name changes they made:

Oakville South -> Oakville. Good
Barrie-Oro-Springwater -> Barrie-Springwater-Oro-Medonte. Definitely needed a change since it contains part of former Medonte Twp as well. However, the riding name may be too long. Perhaps "Barrie-Springwater-Kempenfelt" would be better?
Mississauga East-Cooksville -> Mississauga-Cooksville. Was this necessary?
Mississauga North -> Mississauga-Malton. Why not Mississauga North-Malton?
Mississauga South -> Mississauga-Lakeshore. Was this necessary? I dont think there was even a boundary change. If they're going to be using community names for the rest of Missisauga's ridings, why not change this to "Mississauga-Port Credit"?
Mississauga West-Streetsville -> Mississauga-Streetsville. OK.
Vaughan-Thornhill-Markham -> Thornhill. EXCELLENT
Aurora-Richmond Hill -> Aurora-Oak Ridges-Richmond Hill. Not bad.
Scarborough East -> Scarborough-Rouge Park. What?? This riding is a monstrosity anyways.
Renfrew-Pembroke -> Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke. OK, it's the same riding boundaries, BUT this is a horrible name. Renfrew-Algonquin would be so much more cooler.
Oshawa-Durham -> Durham. OK
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1105 on: September 30, 2013, 08:34:20 PM »

I see they added "Oak Ridges" to the Aurora-Richmond Hill riding name like I suggested too.
So, to recap:
Oak Ridges-Markham is succeeded by Markham—Stouffville.
Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill is a new riding.
Markham-Unionville is succeeded by Markham—Thornhill.
"New" Markham-Unionville is a new riding.
About 20% of old Thornhill goes to Markham--Thornhill but the rest is still called Thornhill.
Richmond Hill is still called Richmond Hill after losing its north 18% to Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.
Newmarket—Aurora is still called Newmarket—Aurora after losing its south 19% to Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.
York-Simcoe loses 26% of the riding to new Barrie--Innisfil but is still called York-Simcoe.

No confusion here.
Logged
Hash
Hashemite
Moderator
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,410
Colombia


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1106 on: September 30, 2013, 08:37:42 PM »

Ugh they didn't even rename the Barrhaven riding? Incompetent wankers.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,633
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1107 on: September 30, 2013, 08:40:23 PM »

Ugh they didn't even rename the Barrhaven riding? Incompetent wankers.

They were too busy insulting NDP and Liberals MPs for that.
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1108 on: September 30, 2013, 08:44:35 PM »

Barrie-Oro-Springwater -> Barrie-Springwater-Oro-Medonte. Definitely needed a change since it contains part of former Medonte Twp as well. However, the riding name may be too long. Perhaps "Barrie-Springwater-Kempenfelt" would be better?
So, Simcoe North is still called Simcoe North, no change, right? Well actually they lose part of Oro-Medonte to new Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, but the name is clear: Oro-Medonte is no longer in Simcoe North. Oh, part of it still is??? Umm . . .
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1109 on: September 30, 2013, 08:53:16 PM »

Ugh they didn't even rename the Barrhaven riding? Incompetent wankers.

Why would they? It's not just Barrhaven. Although I would have gone with "Bell-South Nepean" to match the old ward name.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,633
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1110 on: September 30, 2013, 08:56:03 PM »

Barrie-Oro-Springwater -> Barrie-Springwater-Oro-Medonte. Definitely needed a change since it contains part of former Medonte Twp as well. However, the riding name may be too long. Perhaps "Barrie-Springwater-Kempenfelt" would be better?
So, Simcoe North is still called Simcoe North, no change, right? Well actually they lose part of Oro-Medonte to new Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, but the name is clear: Oro-Medonte is no longer in Simcoe North. Oh, part of it still is??? Umm . . .

The eastern part of Oro-Medonte is still in Simcoe North.
Logged
Linus Van Pelt
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,145


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1111 on: September 30, 2013, 09:15:03 PM »

I don't understand all these naming complaints. All the ridings that have been mentioned just use the names of some landmarks, municipalities, or counties that are in the riding. People will figure it out. I don't see the point of trying to decide what's "the successor" riding to what in an area like York Region where all boundaries are shifting due to fast population growth.
Logged
Smid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,151
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1112 on: October 10, 2013, 09:49:11 PM »

What is the status now? Has the Ontario Report been Gazetted?
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1113 on: October 10, 2013, 09:52:39 PM »

I don't understand all these naming complaints.

This is a political geography forum. It's what we do for fun.
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1114 on: October 10, 2013, 11:07:55 PM »
« Edited: October 10, 2013, 11:28:13 PM by Wilfred Day »

I don't see the point of trying to decide what's "the successor" riding to what in an area like York Region where all boundaries are shifting due to fast population growth.
The point was obvious in Saskatchewan, where two sitting PC MPs instantly ran away from their successor ridings, leaving them open for the NDP.

Similar things may happen in Ontario.

For one example, the Conservative MP for Don Valley East, Joe Daniel, would logically run in new Don Valley East, where the majority of his voters go to. But it has a transposed results of Liberal by 758 votes, 2.17%. The "new" riding of Don Valley North, however, made up of the end end of Willowdale and the north end of Don Valley East, has a transposed results of Conservative by 1158 votes, 2.97%. Where will Joe Daniel run?

And what is the ethnic makeup of each of those ridings? This might be relevant when you consider that Joe Daniel is the first Canadian MP of Malayali descent, that is, from the south Indian state of Kerala. A Tanzania-born South Asian, born in Dar-es-Salaam after his parents decided to leave the comforts of their home state of Kerala to look for work in the British colony of Tanzania (although they sent their son back to India at age 10, to a missionary run school in Ooty, India, and he completed his ‘A’ levels in England).

The riding of Don Valley East has over 65 per cent first-generation immigrants. The majority of immigrants in Don Valley East are from the Chinese, Armenian and Egyptian communities. But I expect the majority in Don Valley North may be Chinese, and Conservatives in the Chinese community may already be organizing to nominate a new candidate in the "new" riding.
Logged
Hatman 🍁
EarlAW
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,018
Canada


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1115 on: October 11, 2013, 03:52:02 AM »

You'd think someone of Keralan descent would be socialist.
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1116 on: October 11, 2013, 08:18:35 AM »

You'd think someone of Keralan descent would be socialist.
You'd think someone whose family fled left-ruled Kerala, and made enough money in Tanzania to send their kid to boarding school in India and the UK, would be fiercely anti-leftist. And he was. "Even as a student in England, he was involved in politics, often the sole Tory in a sea of Labour-supporting students."
http://www.southasiamail.com/mainnews.php?id=12938
Logged
Krago
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,087
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1117 on: October 11, 2013, 08:57:28 AM »


The riding of Don Valley East has over 65 per cent first-generation immigrants. The majority of immigrants in Don Valley East are from the Chinese, Armenian and Egyptian communities. But I expect the majority in Don Valley North may be Chinese, and Conservatives in the Chinese community may already be organizing to nominate a new candidate in the "new" riding.

Don Valley North
30% Chinese
9% South Asian
5% West Asian
4% Black
4% Korean
4% Filipino
6% Other VM
38% Non-VM
Logged
Kevinstat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,823


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1118 on: October 13, 2013, 06:11:13 PM »

Toronto Centre could be interesting. Probably moreso than Bourassa. But it screams "fools gold" for the NDP. Certainly would be worth really fighting for to set up for the new more NDP-friendly riding to come (as DL pointed out).
So, does Toronto Centre become more NDP-friendly under this report?
Logged
DL
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,442
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1119 on: October 13, 2013, 09:16:25 PM »


So, does Toronto Centre become more NDP-friendly under this report?

Yes, would be an understatement - the new TC that severs everything north of Bloor makes the riding into a perfect NDP seat...not that anything is ever certain in politics.
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1120 on: October 13, 2013, 09:31:19 PM »


So, does Toronto Centre become more NDP-friendly under this report?

Yes, would be an understatement - the new TC that severs everything north of Bloor makes the riding into a perfect NDP seat...not that anything is ever certain in politics.
Not quite perfect.

The present riding has a Liberal plurality of 6014 votes, 10.8%.

The new riding has a Liberal plurality of 1149 votes, 3.08%.
Logged
DL
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,442
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1121 on: October 14, 2013, 07:08:58 AM »

I'm referring to the demographic makeup of the riding...it's hard to use the 2011 numbers as much of a gauge since the NDP had almost no active campaign in TC in. 2011 and a very weak, absent candidate.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,080
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1122 on: October 14, 2013, 08:21:42 AM »

I'm referring to the demographic makeup of the riding...it's hard to use the 2011 numbers as much of a gauge since the NDP had almost no active campaign in TC in. 2011 and a very weak, absent candidate.

Plus the Liberal candidate won't be Bob Rae
Logged
Wilfred Day
Rookie
**
Posts: 154
Canada
WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1123 on: October 14, 2013, 08:57:10 AM »

...it's hard to use the 2011 numbers as much of a gauge since the NDP had almost no active campaign in TC in 2011 and a very weak, absent candidate.
Who still got 30.2%. Unlike the really weak, absent "mystery candidate" in Don Valley West who got only 11.7%, almost succeeding in saving Rob Oliphant's seat. A nice fellow, but hardly as prominent as his provincial seat mate Kathleen Wynne. "Nicole Yovanoff, the NDP candidate in Don Valley West, is nowhere to be found because she’s working on a New Democrat campaign more than 1,300 kilometres away, the Toronto Star has learned. An NDP official acknowledged Friday that Yovanoff, who is the campaign manager for Tania Cameron in Kenora, was simply a sacrificial lamb."
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2011/04/27/walkom_mystery_surrounds_ndp_candidate_in_toronto.html
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2011/04/29/ndp_explains_mystery_candidate.html

What did the Liberals give the NDP in return for running an invisible candidate in Don Valley West?
Logged
lilTommy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,821


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -5.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1124 on: October 15, 2013, 07:40:35 AM »

I'm referring to the demographic makeup of the riding...it's hard to use the 2011 numbers as much of a gauge since the NDP had almost no active campaign in TC in. 2011 and a very weak, absent candidate.

Plus the Liberal candidate won't be Bob Rae

All you have to do is see the TC NDP now; they have a "star" candidate, and had very big candidate nomination & membership drive and a very active riding association (i'm on their FB page, they are constantly organizing to be at local events, organizing canvasses, etc) They should do better then 30% in the by-election but it will be hard to win, It feels like a build up to the new boundaries.
Freeland has been getting "bad" press lately also for her rather opulent digs in Summerhill, that won't win her votes south of Bloor (no effect in Cabbagetown i bet though)
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.057 seconds with 9 queries.