US House Redistricting: Connecticut
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 19, 2024, 05:50:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: Connecticut
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: Connecticut  (Read 16141 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: January 13, 2012, 09:54:04 PM »
« edited: January 13, 2012, 09:55:53 PM by cinyc »

Is the horrible boundary between One and Five really necessary?

That is what happens with least change maps, where the prior map was itself a mess. I forget whether the prior map was a Dem gerry, or a compromise map, or whatever, but one thing it was, and is, not, is a good government map.

The 2001 map was a compromise map, though even then they changed as little as possible except for combining the 5th and 6th districts. They made the new 5th district as PVI-even as possible and pushed both incumbents into it.

And given where those incumbents lived (New Britain and Danbury), forced CT-05's strange shape and the bizarreness that is the western boundary of CT-01.

More from the Hartford Courant here.  The CT GOP isn't happy but can't do anything about it.
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,249
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: January 14, 2012, 01:16:16 AM »

Here's a much nicer version:

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: January 14, 2012, 06:53:06 AM »

And given where those incumbents lived (New Britain and Danbury), forced CT-05's strange shape and the bizarreness that is the western boundary of CT-01.

And suddenly it all made... well, not sense, exactly, but you know what I mean.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,812
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: January 14, 2012, 07:49:35 AM »

Yes, it didn't look totally random.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,387
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: January 14, 2012, 01:42:33 PM »

Most likely - again 5-0. Even if Republicans nominate their best candidate (Roraback) for such district - Democratic candidate will be favored. Especially in Presidential year and McMahon as likely republican Senate candidate. Roraback could win in 2010, but, as in MA-06 it will be more difficult in 2012
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: January 18, 2012, 09:41:28 PM »

With partisan data, it's gerrymander time.

First, for the Dems:



CT-01 - 64.6 Obama, 34.1 McCain
CT-02 - 59.6 Obama, 39.0 McCain
CT-03 - 60.0 Obama, 38.9 McCain
CT-04 - 60.3 Obama, 39.0 McCain
CT-05 - 58.6 Obama, 40.1 McCain

Now, for the Republicans:



CT-01 - 68.4 Obama, 30.4 McCain
CT-02 - 58.6 Obama, 40.0 McCain
CT-03 - 69.6 Obama, 29.3 McCain
CT-04 - 55.2 Obama, 44.0 McCain
CT-05 - 53.3 Obama, 45.3 McCain
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: January 18, 2012, 10:38:09 PM »

If I'm the Connecticut GOP and have the opportunity to gerrymander, I'd try to maximize my chances in one district rather than go for two.



51.1% Obama
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,810


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: January 18, 2012, 11:28:09 PM »

A McCain district is possible. This one is 49.975% McCain.

Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,249
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: January 18, 2012, 11:57:20 PM »

except you had to split the 4th, and I don't think that township in the far north is continuous even under touchpoint.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,480


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: January 19, 2012, 02:51:01 PM »

Just run five-meter-wide strips or something along the waterline in Stamford and around the north of Hartland/through a corner of Barkhamsted or Colebrook.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 10 queries.