PredictionsEndorse2006 Senatorial Election Polls - NJ ResultsPolls
Note: The Google advertisement links below may advocate political positions that this site does not endorse.

Source: Eagleton-Rutgers (url)

CandidatePolitical PartyPollGraphPoll Details
DMenendez*Democratic45%piePoll Date: 2006-09-26
RKeanRepublican44%Number Polled: 404
LFlynnLibertarian1%Margin of Error: 5%
-Undecided-10%Voter Type: Likely

  * = Incumbent

NJ race a Deadheat!

 By: hixonhursh3 (I-VT) - 2006-09-28 @ 09:10:57

Question: If the election for the U.S. Senate were held today, for whom would you vote (ROTATE) Robert Menendez, the Democrat, Tom Kean Jr., the Republican, or some other candidate for Senate?

Poll Demographics
Dem: 205
Rep: 167
Ind: 223
Other: 47

Male: 308
Female: 352

About this Poll
The latest Rutgers-Eagleton Poll was conducted from September 24-26, 2006 with a scientifically selected random sample of 804 New Jersey adults. This sample yielded 660 adult residents registered to vote in New Jersey, and 404 adult residents considered likely to vote. Unless otherwise noted, most of the figures in this release are based on the statewide sample of registered voters. Sampling and data collection were conducted by Schulman, Ronca, & Bucuvalas, Inc (SRBI).

All surveys are subject to sampling error, which is the expected probable difference between interviewing everyone in a population versus a scientific sampling drawn from that population. The sampling error for a sample of 804 adults is + 3.5 percent, at a 95 percent confidence interval. Thus if 50 percent of New Jersey adults were found to have a favorable opinion of a senatorial candidate, one would be 95 percent sure that the true figure would be between 47.5 and 53.5 percent (50 + 3.5) had all New Jersey adults been interviewed, rather than just a sample. The margin of sampling error for 660 registered voters is + 3.8 percent; the margin of sampling error for 404 likely voters is + 4.9 percent. Sampling error increases as the sample size decreases, so statements based on various population subgroups are subject to more error than are statements based on the total sample. The following chart shows the relationship between sample size and sampling error. Sampling error does not take into account other sources of variation inherent in public opinion studies, such as non-response, question wording or context effects. This release contains the verbatim wording of all questions featured in the release.

View All New Jersey Polls

Poll Technical Comments

 By: Tredrick (R-NC) - 2006-09-28 @ 10:06:23

The internals on this are messed up. Most of the subsamples do not add up to the 660 registered voters they polled.

Ugly, ugly poll.

 By: Cuivienen (I-NJ) - 2006-09-28 @ 12:28:54

To be fair, the Monmouth and Fairleigh Dickinson polls have also had terrible logistical problems.

This poll undersamples NJ Undeclareds, however, that make up more than half of NJ's registered voters. Other polls have undersampled both Undeclareds and Democrats. (The recent poll that put Kean ahead 6 had more Republicans than Democrats in the sample.)

If only one of them would start promoting municipal consolidation, that candidate would win in a landslide.

Last Edit: 2006-09-28 @ 12:30:16
preciction Map

 By: Olawakandi (G-CA) - 2006-09-30 @ 07:39:05



Last Edit: 2006-09-30 @ 19:54:10
preciction Map

Login to Post Comments

Back to 2006 Senatorial Polls Home - Polls Home


Terms of Use - DCMA Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

© Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Elections, LLC 2019 All Rights Reserved