Does the preceding poster approve of Barack Obama's job as President (-Elect)?

[Cubby]

easy one

Yes, he approves

[Hash]

Aye

[Antonio the Sixth]

Doubt that.

[Bo]

Yes

[Hash]

yes

[tmthforu94]

No

[Bo]

No

[Torie]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie [softy] in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

[The Mikado]

Torie, the question was "does the preceding poster approve," not "do you approve."

Obviously, though, you marginally approve.

[segwaystyle2012]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

[Sewer]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

kill teh rinoz lolz

[segwaystyle2012]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

kill teh rinoz lolz

I'd bet money that he'd have voted for the neocon McCain in the 08 primary.

[CatoMinor]

no

[fezzyfestoon]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

We're largely beyond that crap around here, just so you know.

[segwaystyle2012]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

We're largely beyond that crap around here, just so you know.

It seems "we" aren't.

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

No.

[CatoMinor]

yes

[fezzyfestoon]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

We're largely beyond that crap around here, just so you know.

It seems "we" aren't.

Haha, uh...ok

[Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl]

Yes.

[Torie]

No.

[Ban my account ffs!]

He probably grumbles about Obama a lot... so no.

[Torie]

Torie, the question was "does the preceding poster approve," not "do you approve."

Obviously, though, you marginally approve.

Ya, I had a reading comprehension problem. I did not hear the State of the Union Speech. If and when I do, would that be the final straw for me?  What do you think?

Skip me.

[Bo]

No.

[Torie]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

kill teh rinoz lolz

I'd bet money that he'd have voted for the neocon McCain in the 08 primary.

I did and gave him the legally max contribution in the primary, and then two weeks before the election, decided to vote for Obama, after the financial meltdown hit, and it was rather clear to me that the way McCain handled it, reminded me yet again of his impulsive and rather feckless management style, and lack of knowledge about finance, and lack of care about it, and that freaked me out. The problem at that point went beyond ideology. I wanted a more serious and focused and cerebral guy as POTUS in this environment. Does that make sense?

Skip me.

[segwaystyle2012]

Marginally yes. He has a tough job, and is under tremendous pressures. I am not quite ready to just declare him yet another near sociopathic political whore. Sure he has made some mistakes from an "objective" standpoint, but I think his instincts are fundamentally centrist, and he is trying to be responsible as he sees it. He has been losing it a bit lately, and I hope he does not revert to populist demagoguery, because if he does, I will have to write him off.

It is odd that I am becoming a bit of a sortie in my old age. I may have to seek therapy for that (yet another thing to add to the list). I used to be such a  hardass.

please refrain from voting in our primaries.

kill teh rinoz lolz

I'd bet money that he'd have voted for the neocon McCain in the 08 primary.

I did and gave him the legally max contribution in the primary, and then two weeks before the election, decided to vote for Obama, after the financial meltdown hit, and it was rather clear to me that the way McCain handled it, reminded me yet again of his impulsive and rather feckless management style, and lack of knowledge about finance, and lack of care about it, and that freaked me out. The problem at that point went beyond ideology. I wanted a more serious and focused and cerebral guy as POTUS in this environment. Does that make sense?

Skip me.

My point was that the neocon republicans are the problem with the party. The McCains. The Grahams. The Specters. The Giulianis. The Bushes and Roves and Cheneys.

The corporate, privacy invading war-mongers must go. At any cost.