US House Redistricting: North Carolina
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 03:10:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US House Redistricting: North Carolina
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 24
Author Topic: US House Redistricting: North Carolina  (Read 103163 times)
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,160
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: July 19, 2011, 02:28:59 PM »

Which of these districts are VRA-mandated, and which are just good ol' fashioned gerrymandering?
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,630
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: July 19, 2011, 02:34:06 PM »


Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: July 19, 2011, 02:47:38 PM »

Butterfield's whining put them in a worse position. Districts 1 and 4 are racked and packed even harder. McIntyre had a better shot to hold the old district than this one.


And lol.


For example, based upon the results of the 2008 General Election, Democratic Attorney General Roy Cooper would have carried twelve of thirteen districts in Rucho-Lewis 1 and all thirteen districts in Rucho-Lewis 2.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: July 19, 2011, 03:18:03 PM »

They definitely did no worse than the existing map.

The existing map has a 4th district that reflects a sensible community of interest. It doesn't stretch all the way to Fayetteville for partisan gain.

The existing map only splits Wake County three ways, which is bad enough. The Republican map splits it four ways.

The existing map only splits Forsyth County two ways, and only to accomodate the VRA district. The Republican map splits it three ways.

The existing map leaves the city of Asheville intact. The Republican map splits it for partisan gain.

The existing map leaves Harnett County intact. The Republican map splits it three ways for partisan gain and to prevent an Etheridge comeback.

The existing map splits Rowan and Davidson Counties only two ways. The Republican map splits them three ways.

Furthermore, the Republican map also seems to keep the most egregious splits from the existing map:
          -Three-way split of Cumberland County? Check.
          -Three-way split of Guilford County? Check, although at least they got rid of the touch-point contiguity, I think. The 12th looks pretty damn narrow there.

Now, I'm certainly not saying that the existing map is fair. It is definitely a Democratic gerrymander. But this map takes gerrymandering to a whole new level.

They cleaned up much of this.


3 way split in Mecklenberg? Mostly gone, there appear to be 5000 people in Mecklenberg.

3 way split of Forscyth? Gone.

3 way split of Guilford? Gone.

4 way split of Wake? Back to 3.

There are of course some things that still need to go, like that 7th sticking into both Robeson and Scotland. I see why they stuck all the New Hanover blacks into 3 though.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: July 19, 2011, 03:28:37 PM »

Whatever they say, I'm pretty sure they'd blithely ignore Butterfield's concerns if they felt certain that their map would really give them 10 seats (as opposed to, give them a chance in 10 seats). It's even possible that the mapdrawers did feel that but have since been reality-checked by R lawmakers from the proposed 7th.

Okay, so I'll amend that to "Whatever they say, I'm pretty sure they'd blithely ignore Butterfield's concerns if they felt certain that their map would really give them 10 seats (as opposed to, give them a chance in 10 seats), and hadn't understood that incorporating his complaints actually made it possible to improve their chances.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: July 19, 2011, 03:29:04 PM »

Of course, whether Butterfield cares is another matter. Grin
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: July 19, 2011, 03:42:27 PM »

Of course, whether Butterfield cares is another matter. Grin

He probably doesn't want a primary from an urban black.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: July 19, 2011, 03:49:25 PM »
« Edited: July 19, 2011, 04:04:39 PM by krazen1211 »

Some more numbers.

NC1: 65/35 Kerry
NC2: 64/36 Bush
NC3: 62/38 Bush
NC4: 62/38 Kerry
NC5: 65/35 Bush
NC6: 63/37 Bush
NC7: 62/38 Bush
NC8: 63/37 Bush
NC9: 64/35 Bush
NC10: 64/36 Bush
NC11: 64/35 Bush
NC12: 69/30 Kerry
NC13: 63/37 Bush

NC1: 68/32 Marshall
NC2: 62/38 Burr
NC3: 63/37 Burr
NC4: 68/32 Marshall
NC5: 65/35 Burr
NC6: 64/36 Burr
NC7: 63/37 Burr
NC8: 62/38 Burr
NC9: 64/36 Burr
NC10: 61/39 Burr
NC11: 63/37 Burr
NC12: 73/27 Marshall
NC13: 60/40 Burr



Edit: Thanks, X, I corrected the spreadsheet and fixed the numbers.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,630
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: July 19, 2011, 04:00:37 PM »

Some more numbers.

NC1: 65/35 Kerry
NC2: 64/36 Bush
NC3: 62/38 Bush
NC4: 62/38 Kerry
NC5: 65/46 Bush
NC6: 63/48 Bush
NC7: 62/46 Bush
NC8: 63/48 Bush
NC9: 64/45 Bush
NC10: 64/47 Bush
NC11: 64/45 Bush
NC12: 69/20 Kerry
NC13: 63/47 Bush
NC1: 68/32 Marshall
NC2: 62/38 Burr
NC3: 63/37 Burr
NC4: 68/32 Marshall
NC5: 65/35 Burr
NC6: 64/36 Burr
NC7: 63/37 Burr
NC8: 62/48 Burr
NC9: 64/36 Burr
NC10: 61/39 Burr
NC11: 63/37 Burr
NC12: 73/27 Marshall
NC13: 60/40 Burr



A bunch of those numbers don't add up to 100 Tongue
Logged
redcommander
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: July 19, 2011, 04:22:50 PM »

Wow I didn't know it was possible to skew North Carolina so much in favor of the Republicans.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: July 19, 2011, 09:40:41 PM »

The 4th uses touch-point.



Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: July 20, 2011, 04:43:30 AM »

Of course, whether Butterfield cares is another matter. Grin

He probably doesn't want a primary from an urban black.
Yah, I meant, "we do not need to assume that Butterfield cares one jot that meeting his concerns made the map stronger rather than weaker for Republicans". Though it also makes it first-glance uglier, and not just in the parts added to his own district.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: July 20, 2011, 04:57:06 AM »
« Edited: July 20, 2011, 04:58:51 AM by El Ponchis »

On a point in the Cape Fear River. Actually, if you zoom in close enough on the DRA and color in only the precincts in CD4, you get the impression that it's non-contiguous, but it's a false impression as coloring the other two precincts makes clear.

They didn't want to waste a 60+ McCain precinct with 7500 people in it on a Dem sink district, and (probably due to some local complaint, or to reduce the number of additional split counties) they didn't want to split little Lee County, either.

Looks like they had originally proposed to split one of Lee's precincts (they're huge), too.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: July 20, 2011, 09:49:36 AM »

I hope this map will be heading to the courts.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: July 20, 2011, 02:02:28 PM »

I was in Kay Hagan's office today discussing the plan.

Her aides think that Shuler could very well hold on, Kissell and McIntyre are pretty much up the creek and that McHenry could also have a rough time, as he took in more of Asheville.

One of her advisers told me that McHenry (ideologically) tends to skew leftward of current district. I thought that was interesting...
Logged
Vazdul (Formerly Chairman of the Communist Party of Ontario)
Vazdul
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,295
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: July 20, 2011, 02:22:51 PM »

One of her advisers told me that McHenry (ideologically) tends to skew leftward of current district. I thought that was interesting...

Good lord. Are people in that part of the country Mussolini-style fascists?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: July 20, 2011, 03:12:24 PM »
« Edited: July 20, 2011, 03:16:11 PM by Verily »

One of her advisers told me that McHenry (ideologically) tends to skew leftward of current district. I thought that was interesting...

Good lord. Are people in that part of the country Mussolini-style fascists?

Wealthy suburbs in the South (Montgomery County, TX; Forsyth County, GA; Shelby County, AL; Lexington County, SC; DeSoto County, MS; etc.) are politically probably the nastiest places in the country.

McHenry's district has some black voters to mitigate how Republican it would otherwise be, but it's still nasty.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: July 20, 2011, 03:35:50 PM »

I hate this new map. Sad
Logged
Devils30
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,074
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: July 20, 2011, 11:05:36 PM »

The new maps are even more absurd...I honestly wouldn't be shocked if this is rejected by DOJ and then the courts.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: July 20, 2011, 11:31:04 PM »
« Edited: July 20, 2011, 11:33:10 PM by krazen1211 »

I hope this map will be heading to the courts.

Oh, it will. You're just unlikely to get anything there. This map is of course vicious as they are out for blood.

Georgia will be fun.
Logged
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,838
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: July 20, 2011, 11:47:23 PM »

my hope is that the majorities are spread so thin that a 1974-like election occurs again something this decade so krazen will go into a corner and cry like a five year old.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,870


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: July 21, 2011, 12:02:08 AM »

my hope is that the majorities are spread so thin that a 1974-like election occurs again something this decade so krazen will go into a corner and cry like a five year old.

President Bachmann could deliver a 1974 style midterm for the Democrats.
Logged
BigSkyBob
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,531


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: July 21, 2011, 12:29:55 AM »

my hope is that the majorities are spread so thin that a 1974-like election occurs again something this decade so krazen will go into a corner and cry like a five year old.

Well, it is my "hope" as well. The last map had, ,maybe, three competitive seats [barring drunken assaults of filming cameramen.] If the new map has ten, then so much the better! If all ten GOP members face the threat of having to listen to the folks back home, or be sacked, so much the better!
Logged
I spent the winter writing songs about getting better
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 113,424
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: July 21, 2011, 01:47:11 AM »

I hope this map will be heading to the courts.

Oh, it will. You're just unlikely to get anything there. This map is of course vicious as they are out for blood.

Georgia will be fun.

Uh, what exactly can you do in Georgia besides weakening Barrow? Not much opportunity there to be aggressive.
Logged
krazen1211
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,372


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: July 21, 2011, 08:54:53 AM »

Uh, what exactly can you do in Georgia besides weakening Barrow? Not much opportunity there to be aggressive.

Depends on what they want to do with the Bishop district. I suggest adding the remainder of Muskogee County.

Plus there's the local level maps.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 24  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.074 seconds with 10 queries.