Democratic WV primary + NE fake contest results thread (1st polls close @7:30ET)

[Fusionmunster]

[BundouYMB]

I know I mentioned this but the early exits in Indiana did not take into account early voters, is it the same here? That could boost Hillary somewhat.

The first exit polls in Indiana had Sanders up 53-47 IIRC and the final was Sanders 52.5-47.5.

Are you sure? I could have sworn the first exits were showing a Sanders +10 win.

You're correct. First exits had Sanders 56-44 in Indiana.

[RI]

I know I mentioned this but the early exits in Indiana did not take into account early voters, is it the same here? That could boost Hillary somewhat.

The first exit polls in Indiana had Sanders up 53-47 IIRC and the final was Sanders 52.5-47.5.

Are you sure? I could have sworn the first exits were showing a Sanders +10 win.

Looking back, it was 55-45 on CNN, but I'm pretty sure they always take the early vote into consideration. There's selection bias problems, though.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Image doesn't show up normally. But damn, Hillary with the amazing 11 point lead..... among Democrats. Ouch.

[ElectionsGuy]

I wonder how much Bernie will get among the 42% who want a 'less liberal' direction of the Democratic Party. Pretty ironic he's likely to win that, as he did in Oklahoma.

[Fusionmunster]

Image doesn't show up normally. But damn, Hillary with the amazing 11 point lead..... among Democrats. Ouch.

As I said last page, when 39% of Sanders voters are voting for Trump in the general it speaks more of West Virginia and less of Hillary.

[Eraserhead]

Did they release Sanders-Trump numbers among Democratic voters?

[Fusionmunster]

Did they release Sanders-Trump numbers among Democratic voters?

If they made a graph, it hasn't been released yet.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I'd say there's a decent chance Clinton comes in third.

Probably not, but that would be hysterically hilarious (to Hillary supporters probably too, since it doesn't really matter in the long run).

[JerryArkansas]

Image doesn't show up normally. But damn, Hillary with the amazing 11 point lead..... among Democrats. Ouch.

Oh my god, the old racist democrats aren't going to vote for the woman who served as the black man's Secretary of state.  So damn shocking.

[Fusionmunster]

In the general:
Sander's voters will vote for
44% Trump
31% Neither
23% Clinton

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

In the general:
Sander's voters will vote for
44% Trump
31% Neither
23% Clinton

What an amazing -21 point lead for Hillary!

[mds32]

Goodness WV voters are bizarre. Then again they are the voters that get to decide if they want another 4 HIGH SCHOOLERS in their legislature.

[ElectionsGuy]

The Democratic primary is going to have a lot more votes than the Republican one.

[IceSpear]

Ummm....

9% of Clinton voters would back Trump over Clinton
39% of Sanders voters would back Trump over Sanders

Looks like we may have some Trump supporters causing shenanigans in WV.

Pro-Trump Independents no longer have a reason to vote in the GOP primary.

[IceSpear]

IceSpear and xingkerui talk about West Virginia the way 1980s Tory hacks talked about Derbyshire.

I'm pretty sure IceSpear did not mind WV voting overwhelmingly for Hillary over Obama in 2008, just as he probably didn't mind her winning Oklahoma.

It was a bit uncomfortable, WV in particular. But they only clearly exposed their true colors when over 40% of them voted for a prison inmate over the incumbent black president.

[Hydera]

Im going to bite my ass if Keith Judd magically tops Both Hillary and Bernie with these weird numbers.

[The Other Castro]

[Bleach Blonde Bad Built Butch Bodies for Biden]

Ummm....

9% of Clinton voters would back Trump over Clinton
39% of Sanders voters would back Trump over Sanders

Looks like we may have some Trump supporters causing shenanigans in WV.

Pro-Trump Independents no longer have a reason to vote in the GOP primary.

But what's the point in voting for a candidate in a primary that you didn't intend to vote for in the general?

[IceSpear]

Ummm....

9% of Clinton voters would back Trump over Clinton
39% of Sanders voters would back Trump over Sanders

Looks like we may have some Trump supporters causing shenanigans in WV.

Pro-Trump Independents no longer have a reason to vote in the GOP primary.

But what's the point in voting for a candidate in a primary that you didn't intend to vote for in the general?

Well, if they wanted their vote to matter, they could only vote in the Dem primary. So in their eyes, they chose the "least worst" option in that primary. They also want to stick it to Obama and the Democratic Party.

[Adam Griffin]

Ummm....

9% of Clinton voters would back Trump over Clinton
39% of Sanders voters would back Trump over Sanders

Looks like we may have some Trump supporters causing shenanigans in WV.

Pro-Trump Independents no longer have a reason to vote in the GOP primary.

But what's the point in voting for a candidate in a primary that you didn't intend to vote for in the general?

Every local and statewide primary election.

[yourelection]

Ummm....

9% of Clinton voters would back Trump over Clinton
39% of Sanders voters would back Trump over Sanders

Looks like we may have some Trump supporters causing shenanigans in WV.

Pro-Trump Independents no longer have a reason to vote in the GOP primary.

But what's the point in voting for a candidate in a primary that you didn't intend to vote for in the general?

I can imagine Trump supporters voting in the DEM primary to weaken Hillary Clinton. It would be nice to see some numbers, though I doubt that is possible.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Im going to bite my ass if Keith Judd magically tops Both Hillary and Bernie with these weird numbers.

LOL, no. Maybe other gets double digits.

[RINO Tom]

The Democratic primary is going to have a lot more votes than the Republican one.

Not surprising whatsoever, of course.

[LLR]

Why is this worth more delegates than Delaware and Hawai'i? There are absolutely no real Democrats.